Fame doesn't just make stars, fame makes names safer to give your child.
I am personally invested in the idea of what a "ghetto" name is. My name is Alterrell, while everyone else in my family has a non-racialized, Anglo-sounding name.
Growing up, I memorized where my last name fell in the attendance roll because I knew a substitute teacher or the first few times it would get butchered. I was never ashamed of my name, I was just annoyed that I had to correct people who didn't bother to try.
At one point in my corporate career, I shortened it to Al because I was tired of everyone stumbling over my name in meetings. In my first big boy job, I cared a lot about making life easier for other people. The reason the shortening didn't feel like an affront was because I have an entirely different family name. I know that the people who love me and see me fully don't call me Alterrell or Al.
I shifted back to my full name when I realized there were some less Anglo, common names that people took particular care to get right and correct when mispronounced. That's when I decided for the sake of fairness, I'd make people pronounce and say my full name.
I also decided to lean into what Oprah, Tyra, Beyonce, Kanye, and many other Black people have known: your name is only ghetto until you're famous.
In the United States, names do not need to be approved to be given to children. Unlike in Germany where names require approval or in places like Iceland where names follow -sson and -dottir convention, naming trends in the US can function as a cultural gauge. In the US, names often rise in popularity when television shows become popular or remain evergreen names.
There are also instances where "neutral" European names that become associated with a community where it did not start. For example, Lawrence, Marquis, or Tyrone have different images that come to mind now than 80 years ago or when the Social Security Administration started tracking names in 1880.
Names are not only cultural and social, but have economic implications. Researchers sent identical résumés to over 1,300 job postings in Boston and Chicago. The only variable was the name at the top.
While that study was published in 2003, the 2017 follow-up that analyzed 24 additional studies across 26 years found no measurable reduction in discrimination since 1989. A 2024 follow up sent 83,000 fake applications to 11,000 Fortune 500 positions. Employers called back applicants with white-sounding names 9% more often.
Inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame this year (2026), Queen Latifah is a great example of the power of a less common name (in the US). Dana Owens' stage name, Latifah, means "gentle" in Arabic.
Her stage name is part of a deliberate reclamation within Black American history where community leaders and icons adopted names from Arab culture and/or converted to Islam. Muhammad Ali in 1964 and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in 1971. These naming choices were intentional and political. In a country that has grown more openly hostile to Islam, these names were and remain an act of claiming space. The data shows Black communities choose them anyway.
A name that gets you passed over on a résumé can, under the right conditions, become the name that parents give their children by the thousands.
Screenshot this chart to share
The peak in the naming data is modest in raw numbers but the scale of increase is noteworthy. Increasing by a factor of 26 times shows how impactful women like Queen Latifah are. Black families were naming their daughters Latifah deliberately, in response to something specific they saw in her. The television show Living Single sustained it but she did not need it to create the initial effect.
Screenshot this chart to share
Screenshot this chart to share
The name becomes too culturally dominant to be racially coded. Both Black and white families respond simultaneously. The peak is large. The decline is faster. Fame so total it temporarily overrides the coding.
The name moves within Black communities specifically, in response to deliberate cultural choice. The raw numbers are smaller. The intentionality is clearer: the name is being claimed not simply rising.
We can see two patterns emerge.
Pattern 1: mainstream crossover. What happened with the names Whitney and Mariah? The name becomes so culturally dominant it stops being exclusively racially coded. Based on the numbers of Black and non-Black children born in the 1990s, it is not likely all of the girls given these names were Black.
Pattern 2: community authority. What happened with Latifah? In Part 2, we go deeper with sitcom names that spread throughout the Black community. While the raw numbers are smaller, the intention seems clearer. Names are being claimed because the most prominent person with that name is Black.
Unfortunately, the structural penalties like the résumé callback gap does not disappear for either pattern. The coding becomes blurry.